Legal Opinion
State v. Theriault
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 22, 1995No. 13046PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).1 She claims that the trial court improperly (1) failed to charge the jury that the state’s key witness had three particular prior felonies, (2) denied her motion for judgment of acquittal, (3) charged the jury as to the definition of “sale,” and (4) failed to charge the jury as to the definition of “agent.”
The jury could have reasonably found the following facts. On the evening of December 3, 1991, Nicholas Wassil and David Groleau went to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. GeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. AponteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Shelton v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. SingletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. DawkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.