Legal Opinion

Lee v. Chadsey

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurt, J.

This action was brought in October, I860, to recover the amount of A promissory note, dated January 11,1859, made by the defendant Ohadsey, and payable to the order of the defendant Craig, for three thousand ($3,000) dollars, and payable six months after date, at Ho. 49 Broad street, Hew York.

The complaint sets forth the note, alleges the non-payment thereof, and the due presentment and protest of the note for non-payment, and demands judgment for the amount thereof, and interest.

The defendants, Chadsey and Craig, appeared by separate attorneys, but put in the same defense in substance.

*544The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Condit v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Gt. W. Turnpike Co. v. . LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Dunn v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  4. Newcomb v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  5. The People v. . DyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deering v. . MetcalfNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Guardian Mutual Life Insurance v. KashawNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. White v. McLeanCommission of Appeals · 1873
  4. People v. DruseNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Wilder v. PeabodyNew York Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API