Legal Opinion

Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Gargett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1879PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Gratiot. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Defendant in error, who is the wife of James Gargett, brought suit against the insurance company to recover the amount of two drafts drawn by the *291company upon its treasurer, one for $1000 and the other for $500, in settlement of a loss -which she had suffered under a policy of insurance against fire which the company had issued. The policy bore date February 24, 1875, and the property insured was described therein as • ■“dwelling house on section 34” in Pine River township, aná “contents therein.” The dwelling was insured at $2000, and the contents at $1000. The insurer was a mutual insurance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Van Buren v. St. Joseph County Village Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Campbell v. Great Lakes Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Columbian Ins. v. Modern Laundry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  5. Rudd v. American Guarantee Fund Mutual Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API