Legal Opinion

United States v. Taunah

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1984No. 83-1533PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Chief Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 10(e). This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal from a district court decree quieting title in the United States on behalf of the heirs of Elgin Red Elk. The property in dispute is a tract of land in Cotton County, Oklahoma which had been purchased by Flora Taunah, a Comanche allottee, in 1949. In later…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. United States v. Earl Martin and De Berard Cattle CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  5. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. TsosieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. TSOSIECourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. TaunahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API