United States v. Taunah
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 10(e). This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from a district court decree quieting title in the United States on behalf of the heirs of Elgin Red Elk. The property in dispute is a tract of land in Cotton County, Oklahoma which had been purchased by Flora Taunah, a Comanche allottee, in 1949. In later…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. Earl Martin and De Berard Cattle CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. TsosieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. TSOSIECourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. TaunahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984