In Re JM
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
619 A.2d 497 (1992)
In re J.M., Appellant.
No. 90-FS-183.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued En Banc February 28, 1992.
Decided December 30, 1992.
C. Edward Shacklee, appointed by the court, for appellant.
Rosalyn Calbert Groce, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Herbert O. Reid, Sr., Corp. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, and Charlotte M. Brookins, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee.
James Klein, for amicus curiae the Public Defender Service.
Elizabeth Trosman, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., and John…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Rogers; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Sullivan; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Mack.
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.