Legal Opinion

Total Recall Technologies v. Palmer Luckey

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 24, 2021No. 3:15-cv-02281Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 TOTAL RECALL TECHNOLOGIES, 11 Plaintiff, No. C 15-02281 WHA 12 v. ORDER RE CONTRACT 13 PALMER LUCKEY, et al., CONSTRUCTION, DAUBERT MOTIONS, AND TRIAL SETTING 14 Defendants. 15 16 Palmer Luckey frequented Internet forums on virtual reality and head-mounted displays, 17 i.e., modern electronic versions of the old View Master. He sold his models and kits online. 18 Then eighteen, he came to the attention of Thomas Seidl, an entrepreneur in his mid-thirties. 19 Seidl had developed a 3D 360° camera and he wanted to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API