Legal Opinion

People v. Stuart

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1969No. Crim. 4959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

Defendants Stuart and Baldwin were charged in two counts: (1) violation of Penal Code section 459 (burglary) and (2) violation of Penal Code section 496 (receiving stolen property). (Another count for assualt had been dismissed before trial.) After a court trial they were found not guilty of burglary, guilty of receiving stolen property. They appeal.

There was substantial proof that four radios had been stolen. Later two of them were found in the locked trunk compartment of an automohile which defendant Stuart had heen driving. Thereafter the other two were found in a motel room occupied by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. VannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. People v. RigsbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. NOWAK v. XAPO, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API