Legal Opinion

Amelotte v. Jacob Dold Packing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVaughan, J.

Motion, under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The action is brought to recover the sum of $1,877.68, the alleged value of time lost by plaintiff during the period between the date of his discharge and the expiration of a labor contract entered into between the plaintiff’s employer, the defendant, and the United Butchers’, Meat Cutters’ and Meat Packers’ Union, Local 105, of which plaintiff was a member, and the C. I. 0. The amended complaint, in so far as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Watson v. . GuginoNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Cross Mountain Coal Co. v. AultTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Public Ledger, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Local Lodge 2040, International Association Of Machinists, Afl-Cio v. Servel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  3. Local Lodge 2040 v. Servel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. Hudson County Newspaper Guild v. Jersey Pub. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Finnegan v. PENN. RR CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API