Hellawell v. Garrett Busch & Son, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and denying plaintiff's motion for similar relief. Order modified so as to provide that respondent’s motion for summary judgment be denied, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. There are questions of fact to be determined in so far as defendant Bertha Busch’s individual responsibility is concerned. Upon a trial, facts with reference to the financial status of the estate and as to the persons interested therein should be elicited, as well as the facts in connection with the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bank of Troy v. ToppingNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Hellawell v. Garrett Busch & Son, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by3 opinions
- Durand v. LipmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. FrankenfelderNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Wander v. White House Furs, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976