Legal Opinion

Lounsberry v. Kelly

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1913PublishedCited by 16 opinions

On petition for rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This case is before us upon petition for rehearing. The former opinion is reported in Lounsberry v. Kelly, 32 S. D. 160, 142 N. W. 180. We are of the opinion the conclusion reached in that decision must be adhered to; but, in justice to appellant’s counsel, deem it our duty to correct certain statements contained in the former opinion.

Upon the appeal, appellant’s counsel sought to have reviewed certain instructions given by the court which were excepted to and the refusal of the trial court to give certain instructions requested by appellant’s counsel at the trial. In that opinion this court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Lounsberry v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Gorthy v. JarvisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. StrainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. First W. Bank, Sturgis v. Livestock YardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Kremer v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Nizielski v. TvinnereimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Skoglund v. StaabSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API