Legal Opinion

Davis v. City of Greenville

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 13, 1933No. 13582PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

Plaintiff, an infant of eight years, brings action by his guardian ad litem to recover damages from the City of Greenville for injuries which the complaint alleges he received in this wise: That the agents and servants of the city were engaged, with a motor-drawn water tank, in washing off Briggs Avenue; that the defendant permitted the plaintiff and other small children to play in its streets while water was being thrown by a large hose from its tank, and plaintiff, without negligence on his part, or negligently contributing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Irvine v. Town of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Reeves v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Dunn v. Town of BarnwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Terrell v. City of OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Jackson v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  5. Jackson v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API