Legal Opinion

State v. Santiago

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided July 9, 1991No. 14436; POL. RPT. NOS. 89063025 and 89069086PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Donald Santiago (Defendant) appeals his district court convictions of Sexual Assault in the Fifth Degree, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 707-734(1) (1990 Supp.), 1 and Open Lewdness, HRS § 712-1217(1) (1985). 2 Defendant contends that (1) the offense of Open Lewdness cannot be based upon evidence which establishes a sexual offense under HRS § 707-734(1); and (2) the double jeopardy provisions of the United States and Hawaii Constitutions bar his double convictions of the sexual assault and lewdness charges. We disagree and affirm.

I. FACTS

The evidence from the bench trial disclosed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. PiaHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. MendoncaHawaii Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CaprioHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. FelicianoHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. FelicianoHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API