Legal Opinion

Perruso v. Township of Palmer

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 1, 1991No. 1629 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

Dominick Perruso (Appellant) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County (trial court) which held that Appellant was not eligible for a normal retirement pension until he had satisfied the eligibility requirements of 55 years of age and 25 years of service. We affirm.

Appellant was hired as a police officer by the Township of Palmer (Township) on January 3, 1966, when Appellant was thirty-nine years of age. Effective at that time was Township Ordinance No. 35 (Ordinance 35), adopted on July 3, 1961, which established a police pension fund. Under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quaker City Yacht Club v. WilliamsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Buynak v. Wilkes-Barre Police Pension Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Upper Chichester Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Success Against All Odds ex rel. St. Amand v. Department of Public Welfare of the CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. In Re Arbitration Between the Borough of BerwickCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Waros v. Borough of VandergriftCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API