Legal Opinion

George E. Pew Co. v. Karley & Titsenor

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Plymouth District Court. — Hon. David Mould, Judge. Action in equity to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. On trial the court found for the defendants and plaintiff appeals. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The petition states, in substance, that under a written contract with the defendants, plaintiffs furnished them a certain electric engine, with specified accessories, to be placed in and used in connection with a building owned by one of the defendants in the city of Le Mars; and that a claim for mechanic’s lien for the agreed price of said improvements had been duly filed. They further' allege that defendants refuse to pay the contract price and pray a de*172cree for enforcement of the lien. Defendants deny the claim thus made against them. They admit, however, giving the written order referred…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. George E. Pew Co. v. KarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. The Singer Company, a Corporation v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. Rasmus v. AO Smith CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
  4. Iron Fireman Coal Stoker Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. LeMars Gas Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API