Legal Opinion

Hays v. State of La.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided December 28, 1993No. 92-CV-1522PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Ray Hays, et al. (Plaintiffs) challenge the congressional redistrieting plan (the Plan) adopted by the Louisiana State Legislature (the Legislature) when, following the 1990 census, it enacted Act 42 of 1992 (Act 42).1 In its present posture, this case considers the constitutionality of the Plan, admittedly designed inter alia to increase the number of black representatives in Louisiana’s congressional delegation from one out of eight to two out of seven. The Plaintiffs insist that the Plan accomplishes this result by employing impermissible…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. HaysSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Clark v. Calhoun County, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Shaw v. HuntDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1994
  5. Vera v. RichardsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API