Legal Opinion
Shaw v. Hunt
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided August 22, 1994No. 92-202-CIV-5-BRPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge:
This action, brought by several white citizens and registered voters of the State of North Carolina against various state and federal officials, challenges the constitutionality of the congressional redistricting1 plan (the Plan) adopted by the North Carolina General Assembly following the 1990 decennial census.2 Plaintiffs now claim principally that the General Assembly’s redistricting plan violates their rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because it intentionally includes one or more congressional districts…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Shaw v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vera v. RichardsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- Johnson v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1994
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.