Legal Opinion
Michael v. Dunkle
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1882No. 8645PublishedCited by 17 opinions
From the Steuben Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, C. J.
Appeal from a judgment against.the appellant for damages on account of criminal conversation with *545the wife of appellee. -It is claimed that the verdict is not sustained by and is contrary to the evidence.
Conflict and discrepancies in the evidence are urged upon our attention, but that we can not( eonsider them is settled by numerous decisions.
It is next claimed that it appears on the testimony of the appellee, that the intercourse now complained of took place with his consent. There is certainly no direct evidence of such consent, and it can be made out only by inference from the…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Brown v. Georgia-Tennessee Coaches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Hamilton v. McNeillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Prettyman v. WilliamsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.