State v. Surowiecki
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentShea, J.
The majority opinion does not rely upon a violation of any state or federal constitutional provision in declaring this search warrant invalid but rests wholly upon an interpretation of the word “issue” in General Statutes § 54-33a(c) to include a signature of the judge upon the warrant as a necessary element. The *99defendant also has refrained from making any claim of infringement of his constitutional rights. It has been held expressly by a tribunal whose determination of the issue should have special significance1 to this court that nothing in the fourth amendment to the federal constitution…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- United States v. William D. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.