Lord v. City & County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court. — Hon. Geo. W. Allen, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
This action is by a citizen and taxpayer, to restrain the City and County of Denver from issuing its bonds in the amount of three millions of dollars, to aid in the construction of a proposed tunnel to be known as the * ‘ Moffat Tunnel.” It seems that a statement of the facts must be extended to an unusual length in order that the matters to be determined may be properly understood.
The questions raised were determined in the court below upon a demurrer to the complaint. The complaint alleges the organization and existence of the City and County of Denver under the XXth article of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Prince v. CrockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Admiral Realty Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- People ex rel. Seeley v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Wilentz v. HendricksonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Village of Moyie Springs v. Aurora Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.