Winnebago County State Bank v. Hustel
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Winnebago District Gourt. — Hon. O. P. Smith, Judge. Judgment was entered on a promissory note, which defendant signed as surety, and he appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
i suretieswSverofdefenses. After providing for attorney’s fees, and that-“the maker or makers, and the indorser thereof,” consent-to a jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, the note sued on stipulated that “the drawers and indorsers severally waive presentment for payment, protest, and notice of protest, and nonpayment of thisnote, and all defenses on the ground of any extension of the time of its payment that may be given by the holder or holders to them, or either of them.” The-facts were such that, but for this condition in the note, defendant would have been released from liability.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hanson v. EichstaedtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Wlllmering v. McGaugheySupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Dubuque Co. v. Dubuque & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1853
- Hawkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Bank of America v. WoodworthNew York Supreme Court · 1820
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. v. City of BettendorfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Tuten v. BowdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Bank of Conway v. StaryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Pioneer Const. Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Johnson v. PurcellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.