Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. United Financial Group, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 6, 1975No. Civ. 72-41PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SKOPIL, District Judge:

I must determine whether attorney’s fees and expenses should be awarded from a receivership estate to four sets of attorneys who have represented various parties to three separate actions. These actions arose out of securities fraud committed in the sale of so-called “offshore mutual funds”. Because of the complexity of the facts underlying these applications for fees and expenses, the history of the litigation is summarized below.

THE LITIGATION

The first action, 1 a Federal Rule 23 class action, was filed by John M. Geddes, plaintiff, on October 13, 1971, in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Lincoln Thrift Association, and Fred Thender, Depositors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Donnarumma v. Barracuda Tanker Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1978
  3. Auto, Marine & Specialty Painters Local No. 1176 v. Bay Area Sealers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API