Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Nod's Inc.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 20, 1974No. Appeal No. 1020 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
This is another case in which a landowner seeks damages for an alleged permanent interference with access depending on Section 612 of the Eminent Domain Code, Act of June 22, 1964, (Special Session), P.L. 84, 26 P.S. §1-612.
Nod’s Incorporated, owns a vacant tract of land containing about 21 acres situate in the Borough of Aliquippa, Beaver County. The land, ivith frontage of about 2300 feet, abuts the west side of Constitution Boulevard, a State highway. In 1970, the Commonivealth, by the Department of Transportation, widened Constitution Boulevard from three lanes to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Hession Condemnation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- McCrady CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth v. KastnerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brill v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Tracy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commerce Land Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Hales v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Condemnation of 1315 to 1391 Washington Boulevard v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.