Legal Opinion

Burk v. Hobart Mill & Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 29, 1915No. 4249Published

Error from District Court, Kiowa County; Frank Mathews, Assigned Judge. Action by J. L. Burk against the Hobart Mill & Elevator Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

Plaintiff in error, J. L, Burk, brought this suit as plaintiff below, and alleged that he had suffered, and therefore ought to recover damages for, personal injuries received by him while working in defendant in error’s flouring mill. His claim of negligence, and therefore of a cause of action, is based upon the allegation that the defendant negligently failed to provide safe machinery: (1) In that the main belt on the corn mill .was improperly and defectly spliced, leaving rough and uneven surface and edges; (2) in that oil cups for oiling corn mill bearings had been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hammer v. JanowitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Harrison v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Erickson v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New JerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. King v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Wofford v. Clinton Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API