Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Sayer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 31, 1946No. Gen. No. 43,803PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Friend

The defendants, Ray Sayer and Theodore Thomson, each prosecuted two direct appeals to the Supreme Court from four- separate but identical orders entered in four proceedings in the municipal court of Chicago. Two of the orders were entered upon quasi-criminal complaints of the City of Chicago against each of the defendants charging them with unlawfully keeping, owning, operating and using or causing to be used in a certain building, slot machines, in violation of section 191-5 of the Municipal Code of Chicago, and the other two upon an information filed by the people against each of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
  2. Bobel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Frost v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. J. B. Mullen & Co. v. MoseleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Board of Police Commissioners v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. BergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  2. State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Arndt v. ArndtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API