Flaacke v. Mayor of Jersey City
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Motion for retaxation of costs.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The complainant objects not only to certain items of the bills of costs as taxed for the defendants Andrew B. Church and S. C. Mount respectively, on the ground that the allowances are *58greater than the law authorizes, but insists that Mr. Mount, who is a solicitor of this court, and appeared in the cause in his own person, is not entitled to any costs, because he did not appear by solicitor. The objections cannot be sustained. A solicitor who is a party to a suit and appears in his own person, is entitled to the allowances made by the fee bill for his services therein, except,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Teague v. CorbittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- State v. DoxtaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Spinks v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
- Harris v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- In re Bank of NiagaraNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Segal v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Henn v. Clifford J. Heath, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Freund v. WeismanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Weaver v. LaubSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977