Legal Opinion

Freund v. Weisman

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 24, 1927Published

1Opinion of the Court

The complainants have secured a decree in this cause on a suit to foreclose, which included an allowance of counsel fee. The motion is made on the strength of the chancellor's very recent decision in Henn v. Heath, 101 N.J. Eq. 347. There, the bill was taken as confessed, and the complainant, a member of the bar, applied for a counsel fee to be included in the taxed bill of costs. Following Flaacke v. Jersey City, 33 N.J. Eq. 57, the chancellor refused to make any such allowance, upon the ground that a complainant who is a member of the bar is not entitled, either to the retaining fee or a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henn v. Clifford J. Heath, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. Flaacke v. Mayor of Jersey CityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API