Legal Opinion

Rickets v. Sexton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1976PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

The only question presented on this appeal is the right of a plaintiff to take a voluntary nonsuit or to dismiss an action without prejudice, under the provisions of Rule 41.01, Tenn.R.Civ.P., in the face of the resistance of his adversary.

The Chancellor, apparently pitching his decision on the age and infirmity of one of the parties defendant, held that a nonsuit would be prejudicial and “disallowed” the same. On the same day, when plaintiffs did not come into court to prosecute their action, he dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

We reverse.

As we held in Stewart v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. University of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Anderson v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Cumberland Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
  2. Lacy v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Parker v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  4. Evans v. PerkeyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  5. Green v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API