Legal Opinion · Dissent
In re the Adoption of Baby T.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 29, 1998Published
1Dissent
SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.,
dissenting.
I would affirm, substantially for the reasons set forth in the Chancery Division’s comprehensive and cogent opinion, authored by William J. Cook, J.S.C. In re Adoption Baby T., 308 N.J.Super. 344, 705 A.2d 1279 (Ch.Div.1997). Little additional comment is necessary.
Dr. Zedie, the physician alleged to have negligently caused Baby T’s death, has no standing to attack the adoption judgment. Dr. Zedie purported to rely on Rule 4:50 to set aside the adoption judgment; however, the doctor was neither a party to the adoption judgment nor one of the party’s legal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re New Jersey Board of Public UtilitiesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Stellmah v. Hunterdon Cooperative G.L.F. Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- In Re Application of Township of Howell, Monmouth CountyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- In Re Adoption of G.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Capone v. NortonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.