Legal Opinion

Capone v. Norton

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 11, 1952PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

21 N.J. Super. 6 (1952)

90 A.2d 508

MARY CAPONE, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF HARRY CAPONE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

HENRY K. NORTON, TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. PETER PANEPINTO, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF JEAN PANEPINTO, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

HENRY K. NORTON, TRUSTEE, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued July 7, 1952.

Decided July 11, 1952.

Before Judges JAYNE, COLIE and GRIMSHAW.

Mr. Charles S. Barrett, Jr.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Cooper v. Shore Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  3. Capone v. NortonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. Capone v. NortonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Curtis v. FinneranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Meehan v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  3. Matthews v. NelsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Clement v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  5. Frasier v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API