Legal Opinion
Fenwick v. Kay American Jeep, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 5, 1975PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
136 N.J. Super. 114 (1975)
344 A.2d 785
MILLICENT H. FENWICK, DIRECTOR OF THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT,
v.
KAY AMERICAN JEEP, INC., RESPONDENT, AND JOSEPH FRIEDMAN, T/A FRIEDMAN ASSOCIATES, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 4, 1975.
Decided September 5, 1975.
Before Judges KOLOVSKY, LYNCH and ALLCORN.
Mr. Donald T. Okner argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Margolis & Bergstein, attorneys).
Mr. Douglas J. Harper, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kugler v. RomainSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Riley v. New Rapids Carpet CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- State v. SavoieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Dept. of Health v. Concrete Specialties, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- State v. KinsleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Arcand v. Brother International Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Fenwick v. Kay American Jeep, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Jefferson Loan Co. v. SessionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Leon v. Rite Aid Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.