Legal Opinion

Weilert v. Health Midwest Development Group

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 13, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-2107-CMPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MURGIA, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to strike and for extension of time (Doc. 56) and motion for summary judgment (Doc. 50). The motion for extension of time is moot. The motions to strike and for summary judgment are denied for reasons discussed herein.

I. MOTION TO STRIKE AND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Defendant, Health Midwest Development Group (Midwest), made a motion requesting the court to strike certain portions of the plaintiffs, Ms. Weilert’s, response to Midwest’s motion for summary judgment. Midwest also requested leave to reply…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stone v. WestDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  2. Buonanno v. AT&T BROADBAND, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
  3. Gonzales v. McCabeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
  4. Taylor Kelly v. Kilo Charlie Holdings, LLC and Meritize Lending, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API