SABINO v. Junio
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice O’Brien,
The appellants obtained judgments against Ronald Junio on causes of action stemming from an auto accident. To collect on their judgments, appellants instituted execution proceedings in which they named appellees Hertz Corporation and Royal Indemnity Company as garnishees because Hertz owned the Junio-operated automobile and Royal Indemnity provided the pertinent rent-a-car liability insurance. During the course of the execution proceedings, depositions taken revealed the following:
Ronald Junio, a minor, nineteen years of age, on July 5, 1964, went with his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Northwest'n Nat. Bk. v. Com'nw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Ryan v. FUREYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
3Cited by34 opinions
- Novelty Knitting Mills, Inc. v. SiskindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Blofsen v. CUTAIARSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- English v. Lehigh County AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Chrysler Credit Corporation v. First National Bank And Trust Company Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. ZeranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.