Legal Opinion

United States v. John H. Faunce (Inc.)

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 1, 1933No. 3602PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The merchandise involved in this appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court is represented by Exhibit 1 and Illustrative Exhibit A which are claimed to be lenses, and when assembled are of two types, “bull's eye” and “drum,” and called Fresnel lenses.

Exhibit 1 is a dioptric lens segment for a 500-millimeter lighthouse lens, and consists of one-half (180°) of a ring about 20 inches in diameter. A cross section of the glass forming the half-circle segment is triangular in shape with sides about 1% inches wide. It is in the form of a triangular prism, bent into a half circle.

Illu…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Magone v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Solomon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Electric Co. v. BurtonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API