Freitag v. Gohr
Alaska Supreme Court
1DissentMatthews, Justice
In my view, the due process clause of the Alaska Constitution1 assures every litigant the right to appellate review by a multi-judge tribunal. Since denial of the Frei-tags’ petition for hearing in this case deprives them of that right, I dissent.
To obtain payment under a contract with the Freitags, Gohr filed suit against them in the district court.2 Following a judgment in Gohr’s favor, the Freitags appealed to the superior court. A superior court judge dismissed the Freitags’ appeal as untimely. In their petition, the Freitags have asked this court to review the superior court’s decision…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.