Legal Opinion · Dissent

Freitag v. Gohr

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1982No. 6009Published

1DissentMatthews, Justice

In my view, the due process clause of the Alaska Constitution1 assures every litigant the right to appellate review by a multi-judge tribunal. Since denial of the Frei-tags’ petition for hearing in this case deprives them of that right, I dissent.

To obtain payment under a contract with the Freitags, Gohr filed suit against them in the district court.2 Following a judgment in Gohr’s favor, the Freitags appealed to the superior court. A superior court judge dismissed the Freitags’ appeal as untimely. In their petition, the Freitags have asked this court to review the superior court’s decision…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API