In re Youroveta Home & Foreign Trade Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). As this proceeding comes into this court upon appeal and petition to revise, and as the two methods are mutually exclusive and not cumulative, and as we think the petition to revise is the appropriate method by which to have this court review the questions which are presented, we dismiss the appeal and entertain the petition to revise. Our jurisdiction rests upon section 24b of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9608). The order appealed from was taken as an intermediate administrative step in a proceeding in bankruptcy.
The petitioner appellant, Gen. Semenoff,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- In re SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Ulmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- In re HorganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Freeman v. SeligsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- In Re SlocumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- In Re the Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Travis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- In re Insull Utility Investments, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.