Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 60-464PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUMBAULD, District Judge.

The following facts are established by stipulation of the parties:

Plaintiff (hereinafter called Continental) settled, by payment of $6000 to one Roger W. Barr, a lawsuit in this Court arising out of a collision between a car driven by Barr and a car driven by one John Hoffman. Hoffman had rented the car he was driving from Avis Rent-A-Car, for whom Continental was the insurance carrier. The policy also contained an “other insurance” clause.1

Hoffman’s wife happened to own a car, as to which defendant (herein called Aetna) was the insurance carrier. Under this policy a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Grasberger v. Liebert & Obert, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Kaufman v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1964
  2. Miller v. Liberty Mutual GroupDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Allstate Insurance v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API