Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Ambulance, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue before this Court is whether an employer has met his burden of proving that a claimant was no longer disabled from a work-related injury thus, allowing for termination of benefits.

Metropolitan Ambulance, Inc. (Employer) appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which followed a remand from this Court’s opinion reported at Metropolitan Ambulance, Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Walker), 702 A.2d 881 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997). We affirm.

In 1987, Allen Walker (Claimant), an ambulance driver for Employer, was injured while in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Jordan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Battiste v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Victor's Jewelers v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. County of Dauphin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API