Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Panasiuk

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-5051PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WEINER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Rosalina Rodriguez brought suit challenging a final determination of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development denying her application for acceptance into the agency’s Mortgage Assistance Program (MAP). Presently before the court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons which follow, both motions will be denied and the cause remanded to the agency for further proceedings.

The following facts, as recited by the defendant, are not disputed. 1

1. On or about July 16, 1990, plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gardebring v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Frisby v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Preserve Endangered Areas of Cobb's History, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995
  2. Camargo Correa Metais, S.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Camargo Correa Metais, S.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API