Legal Opinion

Kiikka v. Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1985No. 48531PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParrino, P.J.

Claimant-appellant, Dale Kiikka, was employed by Hogen Industries, Inc. from 1977 to March 25, 1983 as a machinist. He was discharged on March 25, 1983. Subsequently, appellant filed for unemployment compensation.

Appellant testified at a hearing before a referee that the only explanation given to him by his employer for the discharge was his refusal to work overtime. However, he testified that Thomas Hogen told appellant that was only “in part” the reason.

Thomas Hogen testified at the hearing that Kiikka was discharged for several reasons including (1) a high degree of tardiness, (2) refusal…

2Cited by36 opinions

Piazza v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
Adams v. Harding Machine Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
Mayes v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
Bonanno v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
Markovich v. Employers Unity, Inc., Unpublished Decision (8-11-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.