Legal Opinion

Perini Corp. v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 11, 1998No. 97 Civ. 4808(SAS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Perini Corporation (“Perini”) filed a Complaint on June 24, 1997, asserting claims for multiple breaches of contract. On November 17, 1997, Perini moved for partial summary judgment on its third cause of action, which seeks an equitable adjustment for increased costs associated with the issuance of “change orders” on its contract with defendant City of New York (“City”). On January 6, 1998, defendant opposed Perini’s motion and cross-moved for partial summary judgment on the same cause of action.

I. Legal Standard for Summary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dormitory Authority-StateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Razorback Contractors of Kansas, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API