Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Simpson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2017No. 15-1295Published

1DissentEbel, J.

Contrary to the majority opinion, I would hold that the district court erred by denying Simpson his constitutional right to represent himself. Therefore, I would reverse the convictions. Since I do not prevail on that issue, I am also writing separately to supplement the majority’s reasoning on the pole-camera video evidence. On that issue, I agree with the majority that there was no error regarding the exclusion of that evidence insofar as the search warrant was concerned— and, regarding the use of that evidence for impeachment at trial, Simpson has not satisfied the third prong of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Boyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States v. Odell BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Arnold I. Mandel Rona K. MandelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API