Legal Opinion

State v. Tuscano

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1988No. 85-KA-757PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. BRUCE NACCARI, Judge Pro Tem.

The defendant, John Tuscano, was originally charged with pandering in violation of R.S. 14:84(1) and (4). After trial by jury, Tuscano was found guilty as charged, however, the jury verdict failed to specify under which subsection. The trial court then sentenced the defendant to a term of five years at hard labor. Subsequent to the verdict, R.S. 14:84(4) was declared unconstitutional. See State v. Huzza, 457 So.2d 664 (La.1984). Tuscano then applied for post-conviction relief to the district court; his application was denied and this Court likewise denied writs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. LiuzzaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  3. State v. TuscanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. State v. TuscanoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RuizLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. State of Louisiana v. Gregory John RuizLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API