State v. Tuscano
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
J. BRUCE NACCARI, Judge Pro Tem.
The defendant, John Tuscano, was originally charged with pandering in violation of R.S. 14:84(1) and (4). After trial by jury, Tuscano was found guilty as charged, however, the jury verdict failed to specify under which subsection. The trial court then sentenced the defendant to a term of five years at hard labor. Subsequent to the verdict, R.S. 14:84(4) was declared unconstitutional. See State v. Huzza, 457 So.2d 664 (La.1984). Tuscano then applied for post-conviction relief to the district court; his application was denied and this Court likewise denied writs…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. LiuzzaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- State v. TuscanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- State v. TuscanoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RuizLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- State of Louisiana v. Gregory John RuizLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006