Legal Opinion
Sheehan v. County of Suffolk
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 1986PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Titone, J.
The question presented is whether a real property tax scheme which requires notice to a taxpayer of taxes due, notice of delinquent taxes, notice of a tax lien sale, a tax sale without competitive bidding, a redemption period and notice of the impending expiration of the redemption period before the resale of the property at public auction and retention of any surplus by the county, deprives a taxpayer of property without due process of law or constitutes a taking without just compensation. We hold that it does not.
I
A
In Sheehan v County of Suffolk, the named…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- ISCA Enterprises v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Girrbach v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Foreclosure of Tax Liens by Proceeding in Rem Pursuant to Article Eleven of the Real Property Tax LawNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Key Bank of Central New York v. County of BroomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Keiser v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.