Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Source for Public Data
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided December 1, 2008No. Case 08-4167-CV-C-NKLPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Emily Roberts and Sarah E. Smith (“Plaintiffs”) brought this putative class action against Defendants The Source for Public Data, L.P. (“Public Data”), Shadowsoft, Inc. (“Shadowsoft”), Omar Davis, Director of the Missouri Department of Revenue (“Davis”) and other unnamed individual defendants who acted as agents of the Missouri Department of Revenue (the “Doe defendants”). Plaintiffs claim violations of the Drivers Privacy Protection Act (“DPPA”) 18 U.S.C. §§ 2721, et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mallak v. Aitkin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Rasmusson v. Chisago CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Kraege v. BusalacchiDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2009
- Kennedy v. City of BrahamDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Rollins v. City of Albert LeaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.