Legal Opinion
State v. Howard
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 8, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
892 A.2d 751 (2006)
383 N.J. Super. 538
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Thomas R. HOWARD, Jr., M.D., Defendant-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 28, 2005.
Decided March 8, 2006.
Richard F. Klineburger, III, Haddonfield, argued the cause for appellant (Klineburger & Nussey, attorneys; Glenn A. Zeitz and Jordan G. Zeitz, on the brief).
John C. Wright, Assistant Salem County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (John T. Lenahan, Salem County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Wright, on the brief).
Before Judges LINTNER,[1] PARRILLO and GILROY.
The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. PrecioseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of New Jersey v. Scott CampbellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- State of New Jersey v. Gale SorensenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- State v. MarquezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- State v. KimNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010