Legal Opinion

Connaughty v. Winona County Board of Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 2014No. Nos. A13-0745, A13-1198PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

Relators challenge the Winona County Board of Commissioners’ decisions to issue *74a negative declaration on the need for an environmental impact statement and a conditional-use permit for a proposed silica sand mining project. Relators argue that (1) the negative declaration was based on an error of law because the county did not consider the cumulative potential effects of the project, (2) the negative declaration is not supported by substantial evidence in the record, and (3) the conditional-use permit was based on inadequate environmental review. We affirm.

FACTS

Relators…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Corwine v. Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Watab Township Citizen Alliance v. Benton County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. In Re BlockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re City of DetroitUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  2. Minn. Sands, LLC v. Cnty. of WinonaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API