Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peterson v. Modjeski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 17, 1962No. 38,588Published

1DissentOtis, Justice

I dissent. In my opinion the rules enunciated in all of the Minnesota decisions dealing with accidents of this kind, beginning with Olson v. McMullen, 34 Minn. 94, 24 N. W. 318, and ending with Dobreff v. St. Paul Gaslight Co. 127 Minn. 286, 149 N. W. 465, compel a finding that decedent assumed the risk as a matter of law. While these early cases involved actions brought by employees against employers before the enactment of workmen’s compensation laws, the principles which they developed apply with the same force to the instant claim against a third-party contractor.

*422In the Olson case the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Olson v. McMullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Swanson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Geis v. HodgmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Pederson v. City of RushfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Hill v. WinstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API