Legal Opinion

United States v. Friedlaender & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 26, 1940No. 4271PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court (Third Division), one judge dissenting, sustaining the protest of appellee against the action of the Collector of Customs of the port of New York in refusing to release from customs custody certain chinaware unless the articles were marked so as to show Germany was the country of origin thereof.

The collector held that the merchandise was not legally marked under section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938.

The material portion of the protest reads:

* * * Protest is hereby made,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Protest 890764-G of Reichenbach & Co.United States Customs Court · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunn-Heiser v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  2. Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United States Customs ServiceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  3. Bestfoods v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  4. Cyber Power Sys. (USA) Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  5. United States v. 100 Pieces, More or Less, Style 200, Artificial KneesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API