Legal Opinion

Asher v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1919No. Civ. No. 2871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action to recover damages for the washing away of a part of plaintiff’s land by the waters that flowed down the Lexington Wash, near the town of El Monte, in Los Angeles County, during the flood of February 20, 1914. In August, 1913, the Bailway Company had reinforced its bridge across the wash by placing sway-braces on the bents. It is claimed by plaintiff that in thus placing sway-braces on the bents of the bridge, defendant was guilty of culpable negligence, and that this negligence was the proximate cause, or concurring proximate cause, of the diversion of the flood waters on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. KierseyTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Vyse v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Bell v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conlin v. CoyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Fred Drew Const. Co. v. MireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Redmond v. City of BurbankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API