People v. Heffner
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, Acting P. J.
Following certification by the appellate department of the superior court, and good cause appearing therefor, the within appeal was transferred from the municipal court to this court for determination of whether Penal Code section 12031, subdivision (a) 1 applies to the weapon known as a “Taser.”
Defendant’s vehicle was stopped by police for investigation of a Vehicle Code violation; as defendant exited the vehicle, the officer observed a Taser in a holster on his belt, determined that it was “loaded” and arrested him. Defendant was convicted in the municipal court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Robert Michenfelder v. George Sumner Lieutenant Koon C/o Horn C/o Leslie Sgt Jenae Holmes Sgt Stuffelbeam James ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- People v. OrtizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. GondaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- People v. TalkingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Clayton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.